Log In Or Register For Full Access
Close
Username
Password
 Forgot username or password?
Not Registered?
Leaving This Site
Close
You are now leaving GSKSource.
Please note that links to non-GSK sites are provided as a courtesy to GSKSource users, but that GSK is not responsible for the content found therein.
                                    
GSK Employee Access
Close
GlaxoSmithKline employees must use their GSK laptop/desktop and must be logged into the GSK network to access this site.
If you are logged into the GSK network, please select continue to access the site.
                                    
Important Notice
This site is intended for US Healthcare Professionals. By clicking continue, you are acknowledging that you are a US Healthcare Professional.
Argatroban
Argatroban
Injection
Product Overview

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION
Argatroban increases the risk for bleeding.

Argatroban is contraindicated in patients with overt major bleeding or those with hypersensitivity to the product or any of its components.

All parenteral anticoagulants should be discontinued before administration of Argatroban. Argatroban should be used with extreme caution in disease states or other circumstances in which there is an increased risk of hemorrhage.

Caution should be exercised when administering Argatroban to patients with hepatic impairment by starting with a lower dose and carefully titrating until the desired level of anticoagulation is achieved.

Co-administration of Argatroban and warfarin produces a combined effect on INR without additional effect on vitamin K–dependent factor Xa activity.

Clinical Trial Experience:

  • Overall major bleeding was reported in 5.3% of patients with HIT/HITTS treated with Argatroban versus 6.7% of the historical controls.
  • In HIT/HITTS patients undergoing PCI, overall major bleeding was reported in 1.8% of Argatroban-treated patients versus 3.1% of the historical controls.
  • In HIT/HITTS patients, the most common nonhemorrhagic side effects (>5%) with Argatroban and at a greater frequency than historical controls were hypotension, fever, diarrhea, and cardiac arrest.
  • In HIT/HITTS patients undergoing PCI, the most common nonhemorrhagic side effects (>5%) with Argatroban and at a greater frequency than historical controls were chest pain and hypotension.

Please see full Prescribing Information for complete safety and dosing information on Argatroban.

Efficacy, safety, and dosing information for Argatroban:

Summary

Argatroban is the most commonly prescribed anticoagulant for both prophylaxis and treatment in patients with HIT*
  • Argatroban has been available for over 9 years2
  • Can be used in patients with platelet counts that fall below 100,000/mcL3
  • A synthetic direct thrombin inhibitor that has not been associated with antibody formation3
  • The only direct thrombin inhibitor for HIT that does not require dosage adjustments for renal impairment3
  • —Requires dosage adjustments for moderate hepatic impairment3

*For the time period January 2009–December 2009 as determined by ICD9 codes.

Argatroban treats the systemic prothrombotic state of HIT3
  • Argatroban reduces the risk of HIT-associated thrombosis by directly inhibiting circulatory thrombin and thrombin in the clot by blocking its activity3
Argatroban is the most commonly prescribed anticoagulant for both prophylaxis and treatment in patients with HIT*
  • Argatroban has been available for over 9 years2
  • Can be used in patients with platelet counts that fall below 100,000/mcL3
  • A synthetic direct thrombin inhibitor that has not been associated with antibody formation3
  • The only direct thrombin inhibitor for HIT that does not require dosage adjustments for renal impairment3
  • —Requires dosage adjustments for moderate hepatic impairment3

*For the time period January 2009–December 2009 as determined by ICD9 codes.

Argatroban treats the systemic prothrombotic state of HIT3
  • Argatroban reduces the risk of HIT-associated thrombosis by directly inhibiting circulatory thrombin and thrombin in the clot by blocking its activity3

Direct thrombin inhibitors approved in HIT (excluding PCI)
Primary clearanceArgatroban3Lepirudin4
HepaticRenal
Half-life40–50 min1.3 h
MonitoringaPTT or ACTaPTT
ImmunogenicNoYes§||
Approved as anticoagulant forProphylaxis or treatment of thrombosis in patients with HITAnticoagulation in patients with HIT and associated thromboembolic disease to prevent further thromboembolic complications
Direct thrombin inhibitors approved in HIT (excluding PCI)
Primary clearanceArgatroban3Lepirudin4
HepaticRenal
Half-life40–50 min1.3 h
MonitoringaPTT or ACTaPTT
ImmunogenicNoYes§||
Approved as anticoagulant forProphylaxis or treatment of thrombosis in patients with HITAnticoagulation in patients with HIT and associated thromboembolic disease to prevent further thromboembolic complications

aPTT = activated partial thromboplastin time; ACT = activated clotting time.
Approved by US FDA; see indications in table. Argatroban is also approved as an anticoagulant for patients with or at risk for HIT undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
In healthy subjects.
§ In ~40% of lepirudin-treated patients, antihirudin antibodies develop that can increase anticoagulant effects, requiring careful monitoring and dose adjustments.
|| Rare but serious complete anaphylactic reactions have occurred with both initial and subsequent exposures.

Efficacy

back to top

HITTS = heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis syndrome.

  • Safety and efficacy demonstrated in 2 multicenter, prospective, open-label, clinical trials (N=568). All patients had a clinical diagnosis of HIT with or without thrombosis.3
  • As the graph shows, Argatroban reduced the incidence of the primary composite endpoint in HIT/HITTS patients in both studies compared with historical controls.3,5
  • In Study 1 and Study 2 plus extension, HIT patients had a significant reduction in the composite endpoint (Study 1: p=0.014; Study 2 plus extension: p=0.04).5,6
  • In Study 1 and Study 2 plus extension, HITTs patients had a nonsignificant reduction in the composite endpoint (Study 1: p=0.131; Study 2 plus extension: p=0.07).5,6
  • Time-to-event analysis of the composite endpoint suggested that Argatroban therapy was significantly better than historical control therapy in both treatment arms in each of the studies.3
  • In Study 1, when the individual components of the composite endpoint were compared by severity, Argatroban reduced all-cause death and new thrombosis. Amputation was similar compared to control in HIT patients and was higher in HITTS patients receiving Argatroban.3,5
  • In Study 2 plus its extension, when the individual components of the composite endpoint were compared, Argatroban reduced all-cause death and significantly reduced new thrombosis. Amputation was higher compared to control in HIT and HITTS patients receiving Argatroban.6

Incidence of major bleeding* episodes reported with Argatroban in combined clinical trials (Study 1 and Study 2)3

* Major bleeding was defined as bleeding that was overt and associated with a hemoglobin decrease >2 g/dL, that led to a transfusion of >2 units, or that was intracranial, retroperitoneal, or into a major prosthetic joint.
Historical controls received either heparin discontinuation alone or heparin discontinuation plus warfarin therapy.
DIC = disseminated intravascular coagulation.
§ One patient experienced intracranial hemorrhage 4 days after discontinuation of Argatroban and following therapy with oral anticoagulation and urokinase.

Minor Hemorrhagic Adverse Events in HIT/HITTS Patients3

Minor hemorrhagic events*
Argatroban (Study 1 and Study 2)
(n = 568), %
Historical Control
(n = 193), %
Gastrointestinal 14.4 18.1
Genitourinary and hematuria 11.6 0.8
Decrease in hemoglobin and hematocrit 10.4 0
Groin 5.4 3.1
Hemoptysis 2.9 0.8
Brachial 2.4 0.8

* Patients may have experienced more than 1 adverse event.
Minor bleeding was defined as overt bleeding that did not meet the criteria for major bleeding.

This table describes the most frequently observed minor hemorrhagic adverse events in both treatment groups reported in these 2 studies.

Please see complete Important Safety Information and full Prescribing Information.

Non-hemorrhagic Adverse Events in HIT/HITTS Patients (>5%)3

Non-hemorrhagic events*
Argatroban
(Study 1 and Study 2)
(n = 568), %
Historical Control
(n = 193), %
Dyspnea 8.1 8.8
Hypotension 7.2 2.6
Fever 6.9 2.1
Diarrhea 6.2 1.6
Sepsis 6.0 12.4
Cardiac Arrest 5.8 3.1

* Patients may have experienced more than 1 adverse event.

Please see complete Important Safety Information and full Prescribing Information.

Dosing for HIT

  • Before beginning therapy with Argatroban, heparin therapy should be discontinued and a baseline aPTT obtained.
  • For both prophylaxis and treatment of HIT and HITTS, the FDA-recommended starting dose for adult patients without hepatic impairment is 2 mcg/kg/min, administered as a continuous infusion. For patients with HIT and hepatic impairment, the starting dosage of Argatroban should be decreased. For patients with moderate hepatic impairment, the recommended initial dose is 0.5 mcg/kg/min.

Dosing for PCI in HIT

  • For patients with or at risk for HIT undergoing PCI, an infusion of Argatroban should be started at 25 mcg/kg/min with a bolus of 350 mcg/kg administered over 3-5 minutes. The ACT should be checked 5-10 minutes after the bolus is complete. If the ACT is >300 seconds, then the procedure may proceed. However, if the ACT is <300 seconds, an additional IV bolus dose of 150 mcg/kg should be administered, the infusion dose increased to 30 mcg/kg/min, and the ACT checked 5-10 minutes later. If the ACT is >450 seconds, the infusion rate should be decreased to 15 mcg/kg/min and the ACT checked 5-10 minutes later. Once a therapeutic ACT (300-450 seconds) has been established, this infusion dosage should continue for the duration of the procedure. During a prolonged procedure, ACTs should be drawn about every 20-30 minutes. Activated clotting times should be checked before dosing, at the end of the PCI procedure, and after a change in infusion rate.

For complete instructions regarding Dosage and Administration, see Prescribing Information.

Transitioning to oral anticoagulation3

  • To avoid prothrombotic effects and ensure continuous anticoagulation, it is suggested to overlap therapy with Argatroban and warfarin while transitioning to oral anticoagulation3
    —There are insufficient data available to recommend the duration of the overlap3
Initiate warfarin therapy using the expected daily dose of warfarin while maintaining Argatroban infusion.|| A loading dose of warfarin should not be used.
Initiate warfarin therapy using the expected daily dose of warfarin while maintaining Argatroban infusion.|| A loading dose of warfarin should not be used.

|| For infusion with Argatroban at <2 mcg/kg/min, the INR on monotherapy may be estimated from the INR on cotherapy.
If the dose of Argatroban is >2 mcg/kg/min, temporarily reduce to a dose of
2 mcg/kg/min 4 to 6 hours prior to measuring the INR.

Please see complete Important Safety Information and full Prescribing Information.

References

back to top
Next Topic: About HIT

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION
Argatroban increases the risk for bleeding.

Argatroban is contraindicated in patients with overt major bleeding or those with hypersensitivity to the product or any of its components. Continued below

About Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia

About HIT

Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia
One of the most important immunohematologic problems in clinical medicine6,7

In clinical use for over 50 years,8 heparin is an important and widely used anticoagulant for the prophylaxis or treatment of thromboembolic disease as well as numerous other applications (Table 1).8 Unfortunately, heparin can cause serious adverse events, one of the most important of which is heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)9. HIT was first identified in the 1970s8 and emerged in the 1990s as one of the most difficult immunohematologic issues confronting physicians.10,11

Table 1. Uses of Heparin12,13

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE): treatment and prophylaxis
Acute coronary syndromes
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
Thromboembolic disorders
Arterial embolization: treatment and prophylaxis (atrial fibrillation)
Vascular and cardiac surgery
Extracorporeal circulation (hemodialysis, hemofiltration, and cardiopulmonary bypass during cardiac surgery)
Arterial and venous catheters, pulmonary artery catheters (heparin flushes)
Diagnostic and therapeutic interventional radiologic procedures

Adapted from Fahey12

The clinical importance of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is driven by four factors:14,15,16

  1. Heparin use is widespread15,16
  2. HIT is a devastating prothrombotic disease15,16
  3. HIT is a severe, immune-mediated drug reaction that can occur in any patient exposed to heparin15,16
  4. HIT presents clinicians with a medical dilemma14

1. Heparin use is widespread
Heparin is the most widely used intravenous (IV) anticoagulant12 and one of the most widely prescribed drugs in the United States. More than 12 million patients are exposed to heparin each year in the United States.15

Unfortunately, the widespread use of heparin has the potential to increase the occurrence of HIT. Aggressive anticoagulation is a critical requirement during PCI and many other procedures to reduce the risk of thrombosis. Anticoagulation during these procedures is traditionally achieved with unfractionated heparin (UFH). However, heparin is contraindicated in HIT patients. Low–molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and danaparoid are also contraindicated for HIT because both cross-react with HIT antibodies.

Argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, offers benefits in this clinical setting, as it does not crossreact with HIT antibodies, inhibits both circulating and bound thrombin, is relatively easy to titrate, and has shortacting anticoagulant effects in healthy subjects.

2. HIT is a devastating prothrombotic disease
HIT, which usually develops after a patient has been on heparin for 5 or more days, may develop sooner if there has been previous heparin exposure (see Figure 1). 15 Heparin binds to platelet factor 4 (PF4), forming a highly reactive antigenic complex on the surface of platelets and on endothelial cell surfaces, thereby increasing the number of targets for heparin-dependent antibodies.15 Susceptible patients then develop an antibody (IgG) to the heparin-PF4 antigenic complex. Once produced, immunoglobulins, usually IgG, bind to the heparin-PF4 immune complex on the platelet surface. The Fc portion of the IgG then activates the platelets by binding to platelet Fc receptors.15 Thrombocytopenia develops as the reticuloendothelial system consumes activated platelets.15 Most devastating, however, is the thrombotic state that develops as a result of platelet activation and the generation of procoagulant microparticles, and an additional increase in thrombin generation.15

Figure 1. Pathogenesis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)15

Courtesy of Dr. John G Kelton, McMaster University. Levy JH, Hursting MJ. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, a prothrombotic disease. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2007;21(1):65-88.

In select patient populations (eg, cardiac surgery) exposed to heparin, up to 50% can develop heparin-dependent antibodies.17 It is estimated that 1% to 5% of patients receiving unfractionated heparin will develop HIT.17-24

Table 2. Complications of HIT7,11,18,19-21

Deep vein thrombosis
Pulmonary embolism
Myocardial infarction
Occlusion of limb arteries (possibly resulting in amputation)
Cerebrovascular accidents (stroke, TIA)
Skin necrosis
End-organ damage (eg, adrenal, bowel, spleen, gallbladder or hepatic infarction; renal failure)
Death

3. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe, immune-mediated drug reaction that can occur in any patient exposed to heparin
HIT is a serious side effect of heparin, a drug that is widely used in clinical practice.15,16 All patients exposed to heparin, administered by any route or at any dose, are at varying risk of developing HIT and its potentially devastating thrombotic complications.15 This includes patients receiving UFH at full therapeutic doses and low prophylactic doses, including the minute amounts in heparin flushes and on heparin-coated catheters. Patients receiving LMWH are also at risk for HIT; HIT occurs in 0.2% to 0.8% of patients treated with LMWH.14,22,23 With more than 12 million patients receiving either UFH or LMWH in the United States each year,15 the clinical implications of HIT become readily apparent.

If heparin is in your hospital, HIT may occur

Whenever heparin is used, your patients could be at risk

  • Risk of HIT with UFH*: ~1% to 5%14,22,24-28
  • Risk of HIT with LMWH: 0.2% to 0.8%14,23,28

Complications of HIT are serious and potentially catastrophic

Thrombotic Events in HIT Patients27
Thrombotic Events in HIT Patients27

10%–20% of patients with HIT require amputation14,15,26,29
20%–30% of patients with HIT die14,15,26,29

* Unfractionated heparin.
Low–molecular-weight heparin.
Outcomes not mutually exclusive.

4. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) presents clinicians with a medical dilemma
Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for HIT in any patient receiving heparin, especially in those with previous exposure to heparin, presence of heparin-dependent antibodies, history of HIT, or postoperative cardiovascular or orthopedic patients.14-16 Unfortunately, HIT is generally underrecognized and underdiagnosed. In addition, in many patients, there are often multiple possible causes of thrombocytopenia, the hallmark for diagnosing the disease. Therefore, although there are clinical criteria to assist in the diagnosis of HIT, the diagnosis remains difficult.14,16

Figure 2. Criteria for Diagnosing HIT9

Underdiagnosis of HIT

back to top

Three factors may help explain the underdiagnosis of HIT:

  1. There is a general lack of awareness17,32 that may be due, perhaps, to confusion created by the name of the disease, since thrombocytopenia defined as a reduction in platelet count < 150,000/mcL may not be present in all patients with HIT.9
  2. Thrombocytopenia in HIT is paradoxically associated with thrombosis, not with bleeding.
  3. There are a large number of other causes of thrombocytopenia in hospitalized patients (eg, sepsis, perioperative hemodilution, primary bone marrow disorders, another drug-induced thrombocytopenia, or nonimmune heparin-associated thrombocytopenia).15,16

The initial diagnosis of HIT is based on clinical suspicion. 15,16

Laboratory tests for the diagnosis of HIT are useful; however, they still have limitations. Laboratory test results are not immediately available to confirm HIT.15,16,30

When HIT is strongly suspected, stop heparin and treat with a direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI)9,15

When a direct thrombin inhibitor was not started in HIT patients during the 1–3 days while awaiting confirmatory lab results, there was a14,31:

When to Suspect HIT

back to top

Be alert for HIT in presentation and patient history32

HIT: Be Aware
A 60-year-old woman underwent repair of an aortic aneurysm with aortic valve replacement. Postoperatively the patient received LMWH followed by warfarin therapy.

HIT: Be Alert
She presented to the emergency department 33 days after initial heparin exposure with proximal-thigh deep vein thrombosis despite a prothrombin international normalized ratio (INR) of 4.2. Platelet count was 420,000/mcL.
HIT: Take Action
Immediately after receiving an intravenous heparin bolus, she developed dyspnea, tachycardia, and hypotension. Hours after bolus dose, platelet count dropped to 47,000/mcL. She needed therapy with a direct thrombin inhibitor immediately. The patient later tested positive on ELISA for heparin antibody.

Points to remember

  • Many patients seen in the ED have recently been hospitalized. Hospitalization generally includes exposure to heparin (eg, catheter flushes, coated stents, infusions, LMWH). Patients may have antibodies from prior exposure.
  • UFH carries the greatest risk of HIT, but HIT also results from the use of LMWH.14,22-28
  • Clinicians should suspect HIT any time the platelet count drops to less than 50% of baseline or is < 150,000/mcL.15,16
  • Formation of thrombi is a hallmark of HIT with or without thrombosis as HIT is a hypercoagulable state15. The most common thromboembolic complications of HIT are DVT, PE, MI, and stroke. These manifestations may be clinically overt or may not be seen unless further diagnostic evaluation is performed.9,11

HIT is not the same as VTE

VTE (eg, DVT/PE) may be a consequence of HIT, but HIT and VTE are different. HIT is9,33:
VTE (eg, DVT/PE) may be a consequence of HIT, but HIT and VTE are different. HIT is9,33:

Clues to consider

  • Recent or current exposure to UFH or LMWH therapy16
  • Recent procedures requiring UFH or LMWH therapy

    or
  • Treatment or prophylaxis of VTE, including outpatient care
  • Thrombocytopenia not attributed to other causes15,34
  • >50% reduction from baseline platelet count

    or
  • Platelet count <150,000/mcL
  • Timing of platelet count fall is variable15,16,28,34
  • Onset 5–14 days after initiation of a heparin product

    or
  • May occur sooner or later in patients previously exposed to a heparin product
  • Thrombosis and other sequelae15,16,34
  • Thrombotic complication (DVT, PE, MI, or ischemic stroke)

    or
  • Skin necrosis

    or
  • Acute systemic reaction after heparin bolus injection

HIT & PCI

back to top

Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) are an important group of technologies for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease. In addition to balloon angioplasty, PCI now includes other new techniques capable of relieving coronary narrowing, including35:

  • Intracoronary stents are placed in the majority of PCI patients
  • Various forms of atherectomy are occasionally performed (eg, rotational, directional, extraction, laser)

More than 1 million interventional procedures are performed annually in the United States, and it has been estimated that nearly 2 million procedures are performed worldwide.36

Intensive anticoagulation is a critical requirement during PCI to reduce the risk of thrombosis. Heparin is used in virtually all interventional coronary procedures as it has been shown to prevent clot formation at the site of arterial injury and on the hardware used in PCI.36

Unfortunately, the use of heparin has the potential to increase the occurrence of HIT. The hypercoagulable state characterizing HIT plus the endovascular disruption resulting from PCI may place patients with HIT at particular risk of thrombosis during PCI.37 For patients with strongly suspected or confirmed HIT who require PCI, a nonheparin anticoagulant is recommended over heparin or LMWH (Grade 1B).9

Laboratory Assays

back to top
  • Currently, there are several laboratory assays available to confirm a clinical diagnosis of HIT. Because of the high thrombotic risk associated with early HIT, initiation of therapy for suspected HIT should not wait for laboratory confirmation, as the results may not be known immediately.38-40
  • The serotonin-release assay (SRA) and the heparin-induced platelet aggregation assay (HIPA) are functional tests that measure the ability of heparin to activate platelets. While the SRA is highly sensitive and specific, it is technically demanding and time-consuming. Due to its simplicity, the HIPA is used more often than the SRA; however, it is limited by low sensitivity.38-40
  • The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) measures antibodies that react with the PF4-heparin complex. Although the ELISA provides rapid results, is easy to use, and is highly sensitive, it can give false positive results.38-40 The particle immunofiltration assay, or PIFA, is a fairly new antigenic assay that detects PF4 antibodies. The PIFA is highly sensitive and specific, and provides rapid results; however, it does not provide positive or negative controls.41

References

back to top
Next Topic: Guidelines
Previous Topic: Product Overview

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION
Argatroban increases the risk for bleeding.

Argatroban is contraindicated in patients with overt major bleeding or those with hypersensitivity to the product or any of its components. Continued below

As part of its accreditation program, the Joint Commission requires the implementation of the National Patient Safety Goal 3E: Reduce the likelihood of patient harm associated with the use of anticoagulant therapy.42

Anticoagulation therapy poses risks to patients and often leads to adverse drug events due to complex dosing, requisite follow-up monitoring, and inconsistent patient compliance. The use of standardized practices for anticoagulation therapy that include patient involvement can reduce the risk of adverse drug events associated with the use of unfractionated heparin, low–molecular-weight heparin, and warfarin. The hospital should implement a defined anticoagulation management program to individualize the care of patients receiving anticoagulant therapy by42:

  1. Reducing compounding and labeling errors
  2. Using approved protocols for the initiation, maintenance, and monitoring of anticoagulant therapy
  3. Getting a baseline and monitoring International Normalized Ratio (INR) for patients on warfarin
  4. Proactively managing possible food/anticoagulant medication interactions
  5. Using programmable infusion pumps in order to provide consistent and accurate dosing when heparin is administered intravenously and continuously
  6. Having a written policy that addresses baseline and ongoing laboratory tests that are required for unfractionated heparin and low–molecular-weight heparin therapies
  7. Providing education regarding anticoagulant therapy to prescribers, staff, patients, and families

Other Joint Commission suggested actions for heparin:

  • Identify patients with heparin-induced antibodies and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) to avoid life-threatening events from heparin exposure.43

ACCP Guidelines give a Grade 1B recommendation for use of an alternative, nonheparin anticoagulant such as a direct thrombin inhibitor9

  • A direct thrombin inhibitor is recommended whether or not thrombosis is present9
  • Early recognition and treatment with a direct thrombin inhibitor such as Argatroban is recommended for patients with strongly suspected or confirmed HIT (Grade 1C)9
  • An alternative nonheparin anticoagulant such as Argatroban is recommended for HIT patients whether or not a thrombosis is present (Grade 1C)9
  • A nonheparin anticoagulant such as Argatroban is recommended over further UFH or LMWH therapy, or initiation/continuation of a vitamin K antagonist (Grade 1C)9
  • The use of vitamin K antagonist (eg, warfarin) therapy is NOT recommended until after the platelet count has substantially recovered (ie, usually to at least 150,000/mcL) (Grade 1B)9.
  • When started, the vitamin K antagonist (eg, warfarin) should be prescribed at a low, maintenance doses (eg, maximum, 5 mg of warfarin) rather than with higher initial doses (Grade 1B)9.
  • A nonheparin anticoagulant such as Argatroban should be continued until the platelet count has reached a stable plateau, the INR has reached the intended target range, and after a minimum overlap of at least 5 days between the nonheparin anticoagulant such as Argatroban and vitamin K antagonist (eg, warfarin) therapy rather than a shorter overlap (Grade 1B).9

The grading system in the 8th edition of the ACCP guidelines reflects the system adopted for all ACCP guidelines and is similar to the GRADE system, which is being widely adopted by many guideline groups. The phrase “we recommend” is used for strong recommendations (Grade 1A, 1B, 1C) and “we suggest” for weaker recommendations (2A, 2B, 2C).43

References

back to top
Previous Topic: About HIT

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION
Argatroban increases the risk for bleeding.

Argatroban is contraindicated in patients with overt major bleeding or those with hypersensitivity to the product or any of its components. Continued below

ADVERSE REACTIONS

Adverse Events Reported in HIT/HITTS Patients3

Major hemorrhagic, minor hemorrhagic, and most frequently observed (>5%) nonhemorrhagic adverse events among HIT/HITTS patients treated with Argatroban in Study 1 ARG-9115 and Study 2 ARG-9156 are presented in Tables 1, 2, and 3. This safety information is based on all 568 patients treated with Argatroban in Study 1 and Study 2. The safety profile of the patients from these studies was compared with that of 193 historical controls in which the adverse events were collected retrospectively. The adverse events detailed in Tables 1, 2, and 3 include all events regardless of relationship to treatment.

Table 1. Major Hemorrhagic Adverse Events* in HIT/HITTS Patients3

Argatroban-Treated Patients (Study 1 and Study 2)
(n = 568) %
Historical Control
(n = 193) %
Overall bleeding 5.3 6.7
Gastrointestinal 2.3 1.6
Genitourinary and hematuria 0.9 0.5
Decrease in hemoglobin and hematocrit 0.7 0
Multisystem hemorrhage and DIC 0.5 1
Limb and BKA stump 0.5 0
Intracranial hemorrhage 0† 0.5

*Patients may have experienced more than 1 adverse event
Major bleeding was defined as bleeding that was overt and associated with a hemoglobin decrease >2 g/dL, that led to a transfusion of >2 units, or that was intracranial, retroperitoneal, or into a major prosthetic joint.
One patient experienced intracranial hemorrhage 4 days after discontinuation of Argatroban and following therapy with urokinase and oral anticoagulation.
DIC = disseminated intravascular coagulation; BKA = below-the-knee-amputation.

Table 2. Minor Hemorrhagic Adverse Events* in HIT/HITTS Patients3

Argatroban-Treated Patients (Study 1 and Study 2)
(n = 568) %
Historical Control
(n = 193) %
Gastrointestinal 14.4 18.1
Genitourinary and hematuria 11.6 0.8
Decrease in hemoglobin and hematocrit 10.4 0
Groin 5.4 3.1
Hemoptysis 2.9 0.8
Brachial 2.4 0.8

*Patients may have experienced more than 1 adverse event.
Minor bleeding was defined as overt bleeding that did not meet the criteria for major bleeding.

Table 3. Nonhemorrhagic (>5%) Adverse Events* in HIT/HITTS Patients3

Argatroban
(Study 1 and Study 2)
(n = 568) %
Historical Control
(n = 193) %
Dyspnea 8.1 8.8
Hypotension 7.2 2.6
Fever 6.9 2.1
Diarrhea 6.2 1.6
Sepsis 6.0 12.4
Cardiac Arrest 5.8 3.1

*Patients may have experienced more than 1 adverse event.

Adverse Events Reported in HIT/HITTS Patients Undergoing PCI3

Major hemorrhagic, minor hemorrhagic, and most frequently observed (>5%) nonhemorrhagic adverse events among HIT/HITTS patients undergoing PCI treated with Argatroban are presented in Tables 4, 5, and 6. This safety information is based on 91 patients initially treated with Argatroban and 21 patients subsequently re-exposed to Argatroban for a total of 112 PCIs with anticoagulation with Argatroban. The adverse events reported in Tables 4, 5, and 6 include all events regardless of relationship to treatment.

The rate of major bleeding events in PCI patients receiving Argatroban was 1.8% (see Table 4). The observed rate of bleeding was comparable to the placebo arm of the EPILOG trial (placebo plus standard dose, weight-adjusted heparin), which was 3.1%.

Table 4. Major Hemorrhagic Adverse Events* in HIT/HITTS Patients Undergoing PCI3

Argatroban-Treated Patients
(n=112)
%
Retroperitoneal 0.9
Gastrointestinal 0.9
Intercranial 0

*Patients may have experienced more than 1 adverse event.
Major bleeding was defined as bleeding that was overt and associated with a hemoglobin decrease >5 g/dL, that led to a transfusion of >2 units, or that was intracranial, retroperitoneal, or into a major prosthetic joint.
91 patients who underwent 112 interventions.
CABG=coronary artery bypass graft.

Table 5. Minor Hemorrhagic Adverse Events* in HIT/HITTS Patients Undergoing PCI3

Argatroban-Treated Patients
(n=112)
%
Groin (bleeding or hematoma) 3.6
Gastrointestinal (includes hematemesis) 2.6
Genitourinary (includes hematuria) 1.8
Decrease in hemoglobin and/or hematocrit 1.8
CABG (coronary arteries) 1.8
Access site 0.9
Hemoptysis 0.9
Other 0.9

*Patients may have experienced more than 1 adverse event.
91 patients who underwent 112 interventions.
CABG=coronary artery bypass graft.

Table 6 gives an overview of the most frequently observed nonhemorrhagic events (>5%) among PCI patients treated with Argatroban, regardless of relationship to treatment. Nonhematologic adverse events in PCI patients receiving Argatroban were compared with a group of controls from the EPIC, EPILOG, and CAPTURE studies.

Table 6. Nonhemorrhagic (>5%) Adverse Events* in HIT/HITTS Patients Undergoing PCI3

Procedures With Argatroban*
(n=112)
%
Controls
(n=2226)
%
Chest pain 15.2 9.3
Hypotension 10.7 10.3
Back pain 8.0 13.7
Nausea 7.1 11.5
Vomiting 6.3 6.8
Headache 5.4 5.5

*Patients may have experienced more than 1 adverse event.
91 patients who underwent 112 interventions.
Controls from EPIC (Evaluation of c7E3 Fab in the Prevention of Ischemic Complications), EPILOG (Evaluation in PTCA to Improve Long-Term Outcome with Abciximab GP IIb/IIIa Blockade Study), and CAPTURE (Chimeric 7E3 Antiplatelet Therapy in Unstable angina Refractory to standard treatment) trials. Source: Prescribing Information for ReoPro® (abciximab).

There were 22 serious adverse events in 17 PCI patients (19.6% in 112 interventions). These types of events were reported regardless of relationship to treatment.

Table 7. Serious Adverse Events* in HIT/HITTS Patients Undergoing PCI3

Procedures With Argatroban
(n=112)
Chest pain 1 (0.9%)
Fever 1 (0.9%)
Retroperitoneal hemorrhage 1 (0.9%)
Angina pectoris 2 (1.8%)
Aortic stenosis 1 (0.9%)
Coronary thrombosis 2 (1.8%)
Arterial thrombosis 1 (0.9%)
Myocardial infarction 4 (3.5%)
Myocardial ischemia 2 (1.8%)
Occlusion coronary 2 (1.8%)
Gastrointestinal hemorrhage 1 (0.9%)
Gastrointestinal disorder (GERD) 1 (0.9%)
Cerebrovascular disorder 1 (0.9%)
Lung edema 1 (0.9%)
Vascular disorder 1 (0.9%)

*Individual events may also have been reported elsewhere (see Tables 5 and 6).
91 patients who underwent 112 interventions. Patients may have experienced more than 1 adverse event

Adverse events reported in other populations3

Intracranial bleeding: Among patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving both Argatroban and thrombolytic therapy (streptokinase or tissue plasminogen activator), the overall frequency of intracranial bleeding was 1% (8 out of 810 patients). Intracranial bleeding was not observed in 317 subjects or patients who did not receive concomitant thrombolysis.

Intracranial bleeding was also observed in a prospective, placebo-controlled study of Argatroban in patients who had onset of acute stroke within 12 hours of study entry. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was reported in 5 of 117 patients (4.3%) who received Argatroban at 1.0 to 3.0 mcg/kg/min and in none of the 54 patients who received placebo. Asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 5 (4.3%) and 2 (3.7%) of the patients, respectively.

Allergic reactions: 156 allergic reactions or suspected allergic reactions were observed in 1127 individuals who were treated with Argatroban in clinical pharmacology studies or for various clinical indications. About 95% (148/156) of these reactions occurred in patients who concomitantly received thrombolytic therapy (eg, streptokinase) for acute myocardial infarction and/or contrast media for coronary angiography.

Allergic reactions or suspected allergic reactions in populations other than HIT/HITTS patients include (in descending order of frequency*):
  • Airway reactions (coughing, dyspnea): 10% or more
  • Skin reactions (rash, bullous eruption): 1 to <10%
  • General reactions (vasodilation): 1 to 10%

* The CIOMS (Council for International Organization of Medical Sciences) III standard categories are used for classification of frequencies.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

back to top

Argatroban is contraindicated in patients with overt major bleeding, or in patients hypersensitive to Argatroban or any of its components.3

WARNINGS

back to top

Argatroban is intended for intravenous administration.3 All parenteral anticoagulants should be discontinued before administration of Argatroban.3

Hemorrhage3
Hemorrhage can occur at any site in the body in patients receiving Argatroban. An unexplained fall in hematocrit, a fall in blood pressure, or any other unexplained symptom should lead to consideration of a hemorrhagic event. Argatroban should be used with extreme caution in disease states and other circumstances in which there is an increased danger of hemorrhage. These include severe hypertension; immediately following lumbar puncture; spinal anesthesia; major surgery, especially involving the brain, spinal cord, or eye; hematologic conditions associated with increased bleeding tendencies such as congenital or acquired bleeding disorders and gastrointestinal lesions such as ulcerations.

PRECAUTIONS

back to top

Hepatic impairment3
Caution should be exercised when administering Argatroban to patients with hepatic impairment by starting with a lower dose and carefully titrating until the desired level of anticoagulation is achieved. Achievement of steady state aPTT levels may take longer and require more Argatroban dose adjustments in patients with hepatic impairment compared to patients with normal hepatic function. Also, upon cessation of Argatroban infusion in the hepatically impaired patient, full reversal of anticoagulant effects may require longer than 4 hours due to decreased clearance and increased elimination half-life of Argatroban.

Use of high doses of Argatroban in PCI patients with clinically significant hepatic disease or AST/ALT levels >3 times the upper limit of normal should be avoided. Such patients were not studied in PCI trials.

Laboratory tests3
Anticoagulation effects associated with Argatroban infusion at doses up to 40 mcg/kg/min correlate with increases of the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Although other global clot-based tests including prothrombin time (PT), the International Normalized Ratio (INR), and thrombin time (TT) are affected by Argatroban, the therapeutic ranges for these tests have not been identified for Argatroban therapy. Plasma Argatroban concentrations also correlate well with anticoagulant effects.

Drug interactions3
Heparin:
Heparin is contraindicated in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. If Argatroban is to be initiated after cessation of heparin therapy, allow sufficient time for heparin's effect on the aPTT to decrease prior to initiation of Argatroban therapy.

Aspirin/acetaminophen: Pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions have not been demonstrated between Argatroban and concomitantly administered aspirin or acetaminophen.

In clinical trials involving HIT/HITTS patients undergoing PCI, all patients received oral aspirin (325 mg) 2 to 24 hours prior to the interventional procedure as per protocol.

Oral anticoagulant agents: Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between Argatroban and warfarin (7.5 mg single oral dose) have not been demonstrated. However, the concomitant use of Argatroban and warfarin results in prolongation of the prothrombin time (PT) and International Normalized Ratio (INR).

Thrombolytic agents: The safety and effectiveness of Argatroban with thrombolytic agents have not been established.

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists: The safety and effectiveness of Argatroban with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists have not been established.

Coadministration: Concomitant use of Argatroban with antiplatelet agents, thrombolytics, and other anticoagulants may increase the risk of bleeding.

Drug-drug interactions have not been observed between Argatroban and digoxin or erythromycin.

Carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, and impairment of fertility3
No long-term studies in animals have been performed to evaluate the carcinogenic potential of Argatroban. Argatroban was not genotoxic in several tests for genotoxicity. Argatroban was found to have no effect on fertility and reproductive performance of male and female rats.

Pregnancy3
Teratogenic effects: Pregnancy Category B. There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. Teratology studies in rats and rabbits have demonstrated no evidence of impaired fertility or harm to the fetus due to Argatroban. Because animal reproduction studies are not always predictive of human response, this drug should be used during pregnancy only if clearly needed.

Nursing mothers3
Experiments in rats show that Argatroban is detected in milk. It is not known whether this drug is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk and because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants from Argatroban, a decision should be made whether to discontinue nursing or to discontinue the drug, taking into account the importance of the drug to the mother.

Pediatric use3
The safety and effectiveness of Argatroban, including the appropriate anticoagulation goals and duration of therapy, have not been established among pediatric patients. [Please also see discussion under Special Populations.]

OVERDOSAGE

back to top

Symptoms/Treatment3
Excessive anticoagulation, with or without bleeding, may be controlled by discontinuing Argatroban or by decreasing the Argatroban infusion dosage. In clinical studies at therapeutic levels, anticoagulation parameters generally return to baseline within 2 to 4 hours after discontinuation of the drug. Reversal of anticoagulant effect may take longer in patients with hepatic impairment.

No specific antidote to Argatroban is available; if life-threatening bleeding occurs and excessive plasma levels of Argatroban are suspected, Argatroban should be discontinued immediately, aPTT and other coagulation tests should be determined. Symptomatic and supportive therapy should be provided to the patient. When Argatroban was administered as a continuous infusion (2 mcg/kg/min) prior to and during a 4-hour hemodialysis session, approximately 20% of Argatroban was cleared through dialysis.

SPECIAL POPULATIONS

back to top

Renal impairment3
No dosage adjustment is necessary in patients with renal dysfunction.

Hepatic impairment3
For adult patients with moderate hepatic impairment, an initial dose of 0.5 mcg/kg/min is recommended, based on the approximate 4-fold decrease in Argatroban clearance relative to those with normal hepatic function. The aPTT should be monitored closely, and the dosage should be adjusted as clinically indicated. [Please also see discussion under Precautions.]

Pediatrics3
Argatroban clearance is decreased in seriously ill pediatric patients. Pharmacokinetic parameters of Argatroban were characterized in a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis with sparse data from 15 seriously ill pediatric patients. Clearance in pediatric patients (0.16 L/hr/kg) was 50% lower compared to healthy adults (0.31 L/hr/kg). Four pediatric patients with elevated bilirubin (secondary to cardiac complications or hepatic impairment) had, on average, 80% lower clearance (0.03 L/hr/kg) when compared to pediatric patients with normal bilirubin levels.

EFFECT ON INTERNATIONAL NORMALIZED RATIO (INR)3

back to top

Because Argatroban is a direct thrombin inhibitor, co-administration of Argatroban and warfarin produces a combined effect on the laboratory measurement of the INR. However, concurrent therapy, compared to warfarin monotherapy, exerts no additional effect on vitamin K–dependent factor Xa activity.

The relationship between INR on co-therapy and warfarin alone is dependent on both the dose of Argatroban and the thromboplastin reagent used. This relationship is influenced by the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) of the thromboplastin. Thromboplastins with higher ISI values than shown result in higher INRs on combined therapy of warfarin and Argatroban. INR data for an Argatroban dose of 2 mcg/kg/min in normal individuals with 2 commonly utilized thromboplastins with ISI values of 0.88 (Innovin, Dade) and 1.78 (Thromboplastin C Plus, Dade) are presented in Figure 2 of the prescribing information.

Previous Topic: Guidelines

Required Information

A state licence number is required to be on file for the state in which samples will be delivered
State Licence Number Licensing State

Argatroban
Injection

Argatroban is indicated as an anticoagulant for prophylaxis or treatment of thrombosis in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Argatroban is indicated as an anticoagulant in patients with or at risk for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Important Safety Information
Argatroban increases the risk for bleeding.

Argatroban is contraindicated in patients with overt major bleeding or those with hypersensitivity to the product or any of its components.

All parenteral anticoagulants should be discontinued before administration of Argatroban. Argatroban should be used with extreme caution in disease states or other circumstances in which there is an increased risk of hemorrhage.

Caution should be exercised when administering Argatroban to patients with hepatic impairment by starting with a lower dose and carefully titrating until the desired level of anticoagulation is achieved.

Co-administration of Argatroban and warfarin produces a combined effect on INR without additional effect on vitamin K–dependent factor Xa activity.

Clinical Trial Experience:

  • Overall major bleeding was reported in 5.3% of patients with HIT/HITTS treated with Argatroban versus 6.7% of the historical controls.
  • In HIT/HITTS patients undergoing PCI, overall major bleeding was reported in 1.8% of Argatroban-treated patients versus 3.1% of the historical controls.
  • In HIT/HITTS patients, the most common nonhemorrhagic side effects (>5%) with Argatroban and at a greater frequency than historical controls were hypotension, fever, diarrhea, and cardiac arrest.
  • In HIT/HITTS patients undergoing PCI, the most common nonhemorrhagic side effects (>5%) with Argatroban and at a greater frequency than historical controls were chest pain and hypotension.

Please see full Prescribing Information for complete safety and dosing information on Argatroban.